Secular commentators and anti-religion advocates tend to point to religion as a leading cause of violence (Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion, for instance) and, on face value, they would appear to have a point. In recent days, Shia mourners have been gunned down by terrorists in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the Israelis and Palestinians are eyeing up the prospects for a Third Intifada in the Holy Land, and the war against the misnomer to end all misnomers, the Islamic State (IS), continues with the Russian Orthodox Church’s blessing. I would personally argue that people kill people for all manner of ideologies, including rabid secularism (just take a look at Stalin, or Turkey’s experience with a military junta standing as “guardians” of Kemalist secularism). That, however, is a debate for another time. What is important is that people do die and kill for their religious beliefs, irrespective of whether or not their beliefs have anything even tangentially related to the religion in question.
With politicians such as Maliki holding positions of the highest power and authority in Iraq making religiously charged speeches like that, is it any surprise that sectarian Shia militiamen like the self-titled Abu Azrael (the Angel of Death) can literally slice strips of human flesh from a suspended Sunni with a katana, as though he was a donner kebab? Quite contrary to the romanticisation of a man who is quite possibly a war criminal commonly found in the press, Abu Azrael has even gone on television and said that anyone who criticises the Shia Popular Mobilisation Unit (PMU) “is a terrorist”, which would of course include many commentators and analysts the world over. In Iraq, terrorism is a capital offence. These problems have not been resolved with Maliki’s removal from executive power, as the aforementioned human donner kebab incident happened on Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi’s watch, who was also photographed kissing Abu Azrael from his head, a sign of the deepest respect in Arab culture.
The religious authorities in Iraq, Sunni and Shia, have a joint responsibility to denounce divisive and dangerous declarations by politicians. Although IS of course has its own ideologues who promote hatred, death and destruction on all (not exclusively the Shia), mainstream Sunni religious authorities have denounced IS, condemned their actions and decreed their “state” to be illegitimate. On the other hand, and with notable exceptions such as Ayatollah al-Sarkhi who stood against Maliki’s rampant sectarianism and was attacked with gunships, Ayatollah Sistani, whom the PMU owe their existence to, said nothing to denounce inflammatory speeches that led to the deaths of protesters. The message here is that if you openly defy an Iranian-backed politician such as Maliki, Shia religious authority or not, you will be targeted. In Iraq, as in many other places in the world, power has no sect or creed, and you will be silenced if you stand against power holders, all justified by, and in the name of, propagating the continuing vengeance for Hussein’s death.
Before Ashura is observed at the end of the week, and before people start killing in Hussein’s name, they should first ask themselves – would Hussein approve of all of this bloodshed in his name? Or would he turn towards God, ashen faced, seeking refuge from those who would abuse his memory by unleashing untold horrors in the name of avenging him? Hussein challenged the dominant power of his day because he believed it to be the right thing to do, and because he felt there were those who were oppressed and he had a responsibility to stand for them. He certainly did not commit any atrocities and decide to cut strips of meat from the bodies of his enemies, nor did he attack and set ablaze the neighbourhoods of those whom he disagreed with, as occurred to little international media fanfare in al-Adhamiya in Baghdad last May.
If Hussein was alive today, he would have stood against the tyranny of the tyrants running rampant across the Middle East. He would have stood with the Syrian people against the Assad dynasty, with the persecuted Baluchis and Arabs in Iran, and with all of the oppressed around the world. I am sure the first thing he would say today to those who believe they are avenging him is, “Not in my name”.
View the article here